Wirth v. State
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
Plaintiffs Daniel J. Wirth and the California Correctional Supervisors Organization (collectively CCSO) filed a petition for writ of mandate seeking to compel defendants — the Governor, the State of California and the Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) — to afford salary increases for state correctional supervisors in fiscal year 2003-2004, increases that plaintiffs claimed were mandated by Government Code sections 19849.18 and 19849.22.
Section 19849.18 provides that supervisors of correctional officers shall receive “salary and benefits changes” that are “at least…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coastside Fishing Club v. California Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS'ASSN. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Coachella Valley Unified School Dist. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.