Legal Opinion
Coachella Valley Unified School Dist. v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 2009No. A120667PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
California participates in the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLBA) (20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.) and includes in its assessment program for purposes of NCLBA accountability most of the nearly 1.6 million students attending public schools in this state who are classified as “limited English proficient” or “English learners.”1 California tests all its students in English, although school districts are obliged to provide limited English proficient (LEP) students certain accommodations or testing variations if the same are regularly used in the classroom or for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- South Dakota v. DoleSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe v. Albany Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Schram Construction, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cal. Resources Production Corp. v. Antioch City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Coachella Valley Unified School Dist. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In re DohnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022