Brunswick Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*207 DAMAGES OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
This ease, originally involving two patents, was brought before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a) (1988) and 35 U.S.C. § 100, et seq. (the “Patent Act”). The underlying infringement dispute concerns the U.S. Department of the Army (“Army”)’s procurement of optical, infrared, and radar camouflage screens such as those used in Operations Desert Shield and Storm during the conflict in the Persian Gulf. Plaintiff, Brunswick Corporation (“Brunswick”), asserted that the camouflage screens supplied to the government by Teledyne Brown Engineering (“Teledyne”)…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Textainer Equipment Management Limited v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.