Legal Opinion
Zoltek Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 14, 2002No. 96-166CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge.
I. Introduction
This action is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Defendant contends that 28 U.S.C. § 1498(c) bars Plaintiff from receiving compensation for the use of methods claimed in U.S. Patent No. Re. 34,-162 (“the ’162 Patent”) in the manufacture of silicon carbide fiber sheet products used by *831the F-22 fighter program because the claim arises in a foreign country. For the reasons stated herein, the Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is STAYED pending additional…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Zoltek Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Iris Corporation v. Japan Airlines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Leonardo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.