Legal Opinion
Lawrence Loeb v. Al-Mor Corp.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 27, 1991No. File 260019PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
This action was brought pursuant to the authority of General Statutes § 47-31 for a judgment settling the title to certain real estate. Both parties claim ownership by record title and by adverse possession.
The defendant does not dispute the plaintiffs’ title, ownership and possession of the real estate known as the “Fall Swamp lot.” It is agreed that the plaintiffs own that parcel as described in paragraphs two, three and four of both counts of their second amended complaint. The parcel of real estate that is in controversy has been referred to as the “Hubinger property.” The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Foote v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Gaul v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Barrs v. ZukowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lakeview Farm, Inc. v. EnmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Remington Investments, Inc. v. National Properties, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Loeb v. Al-Mor Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Sokoloski v. McCorisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Zisk v. Walkley Heights Associates, No. Cv98-008 60 79 (May 24, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002