Legal Opinion
Gaul v. Baker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The present action is the sequel to a former action considered by this court, Newman v. Gaul, 102 Conn. 425, 129 Atl. 221, and the premises involved are the same in both actions. The printed record in that action is made a part of the finding on this appeal. The former owner of the premises, one Newman, verbally leased them to Baker, who went into possession and still remains, to the exclusion' of all others. By the terms of the lease Baker was given two successive rights of renewal of his lease, an option to purchase at any time during the tenancy and upon failure to purchase was to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dawson v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Foote v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Layton v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Newman v. GaulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
3Cited by22 opinions
- Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Burns v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- City National Bank v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.