Legal Opinion

Lakeview Farm, Inc. v. Enman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 10, 1997No. 95-324PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendants David and Sandra Enman appeal a Chittenden Superior Court order that confirmed the boundary line of plaintiffs Maurice and Rita Martel’s land, Lakeview Farm. The Enmans contend that (1) the evidence was insufficient to show the boundary was established by acquiescence, (2) the court erred in finding that a description in earlier deeds must refer to holdings in an adjoining town, (3) the court erred in giving effect to a second “corrective” deed in the chain of title, and (4) the court abused its discretion when it imposed sanctions for introducing a new theory of ownership during…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. GillespieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Cameron v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Day v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  5. Potwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Roy v. Woodstock Community Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. In Re Stanley & Susan Potter, Debtors. Mortgage Lenders Network, Usa, D/B/A Family Credit Connection v. Jan M. Sensenich, Trustee, Stanley and Susan Potter, United States Trustee, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. O'Hearne v. McCLAMMERSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  5. Cameron's Run, LLP v. FrohockSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API