Legal Opinion

Sokoloski v. McCorison

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 10, 2008No. AC 28436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The defendants, Cameron A. McCorison and his mother, Andrea McCorisin, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Robert A. Sokoloski, in this quiet title action concerning a boundary dispute. On appeal, the defendants claim, alternatively, that the court improperly concluded that the plaintiff (1) was the fee simple owner of the land in dispute, (2) had a right-of-way over the land in dispute by way of adverse possession and (3) had a prescriptive easement over the land in dispute. 2 We conclude that the court properly determined that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. DrskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  2. Chesler v. City of DerbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Remington Investments, Inc. v. National Properties, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Loeb v. Al-Mor Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. MacDonald v. PintoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McFarland v. Department of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API