Sokoloski v. McCorison
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The defendants, Cameron A. McCorison and his mother, Andrea McCorisin, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Robert A. Sokoloski, in this quiet title action concerning a boundary dispute. On appeal, the defendants claim, alternatively, that the court improperly concluded that the plaintiff (1) was the fee simple owner of the land in dispute, (2) had a right-of-way over the land in dispute by way of adverse possession and (3) had a prescriptive easement over the land in dispute. 2 We conclude that the court properly determined that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. DrskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Chesler v. City of DerbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Remington Investments, Inc. v. National Properties, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Loeb v. Al-Mor Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- MacDonald v. PintoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McFarland v. Department of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009