Legal Opinion
County of Santa Barbara v. United States
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 7, 1967No. Civ. No. 65-267-IHPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
IRVING HILL, District Judge.
The instant controversy is between the County of Santa Barbara, California (Plaintiff) and the United States (Defendant). The question presented is which of the two must bear the cost of relocating certain water-distribution lines owned by the United States and located within County road easements and along and under County highways.
The United States, as part of the Cachuma Reclamation Project, owns a water-distribution system which delivers water from the Project to the Goleta County Water District. A portion of these distribution lines lie along…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Becktold Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- United States v. 19.86 Acres of Land in East St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Hayes v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Center Line v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Hunt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987
- City of Center Line v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Artesian Water Co. v. State, Department of Highways & TransportationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- Near v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.