Legal Opinion
Artesian Water Co. v. State, Department of Highways & Transportation
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided November 22, 1974PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIFFERATO, Judge.
This is an action by Artesian Water Company (Artesian) against the State of Delaware, Department of Highways and Transportation (State Highway Department), seeking a declaratory judgment that Artesian is entitled to reimbursement in the amount of all water facility relocation expenses that it will necessarily incur by reason of a recently approved state highway reconstruction project involving Delaware Route 141 (Basin Road). Both parties have moved for summary judgment in their respective favor on the issue of Artesian’s entitlement to compensation for the full amount…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Roosevelt Lathan and Pearline Lathan, His Wife v. John A. Volpe, as Secretary of the United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- New York City Tunnel Authority v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Artesian Water Co. v. State, Department of Highways & TransportationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Mac Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Delaware, Inc. v. ElliottSuperior Court of Delaware · 1982
- Asociación de Hoteles y de Turismo de Puerto Rico v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
- New Castle County School District v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.