Legal Opinion
City of Center Line v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1970No. Docket 7,436PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, J.
Michigan Bell Telephone Company appeals from the decision of the Macomb County Circuit Court barring its intervention in condemnation proceedings instituted by the city of Center Line pursuant to the Rehabilitation of Blighted Areas Act, Pa 1945, No 344, as amended. The primary issue before us is whether Michigan Bell has a compensable right for expenses in relocating equipment as a result of urban renewal which it may assert in condemnation proceedings.
The city of Center Line undertook a federally-assisted low-rent housing project to rehabilitate an area of the city. The plan contemplated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Slum Clearance Between Hastings, Gratiot, De Quindre and Mullett StreetsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- MTR. OF CONS. EDISON CO. v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- City of Niles v. Michigan Gas & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- City of Center Line v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Board of Education v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- City of Columbus v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Boise Redevelopment AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.