Legal Opinion
Investors Mortgage Co. v. Rodia
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 1, 1993No. 11629PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The sole issue in this case is whether the beneficiary of a trust, who, without objection, is substituted for the trustee as the plaintiff in a foreclosure action after title has vested in the trustee, has standing to file a motion for a deficiency judgment. The substitute plaintiff, the beneficial owner of the mortgage, claims that the defendants’ motion to dismiss was improperly granted because the substitute plaintiff had standing to file the motion for a deficiency judgment. We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the disposition of this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Nikitiuk v. PishteySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- First Bank v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Trevek Enterprises, Inc. v. Victory Contracting Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Hackbarth v. HackbarthConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Hudson City Savings Bank v. HellmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Lupinacci v. City of StamfordConnecticut Superior Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.