Legal Opinion
Nikitiuk v. Pishtey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 5, 1966PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
This appeal is from a judgment of the
Superior Court sustaining an appeal from a decree of the Probate Court for the district of Derby. There is no dispute as to the facts relevant to the appeal. The appellees, whom we will hereinafter refer to as the plaintiffs, are two brothers and a niece of Fred K. Nikitenko, whose estate was settled in the Derby Probate Court. By its decree dated December 15, 1959, that court determined that the plaintiffs were the residuary distributees of the estate, that each of them lived in the Kiev Region in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, that, if their…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Gaer Bros., Inc. v. MottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Salem Park, Inc. v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Silva v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.