Wyckoff v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
These actions were brought by the plaintiffs to quiet title to certain street areas, on tidelands of the first class now located within the city of Seattle. The plaintiffs own adjoining properties; and each claims title to certain portions of the platted streets which abut their respective properties, alleging that they have been vacated by operation of law. The streets in question were platted in 1897 on tidelands owned by the state and located outside the city limits, but within two miles thereof. They have never been opened. The area was annexed to the city of West Seattle in 1905, and to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murphy v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Brown v. OlmstedWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Tooze v. Willamette Valley Southern Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Bussell v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baxter-Wyckoff Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Real Progress, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- DeWeese v. City of Port TownsendCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Michelson Bros. v. BadermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Baxter-Wyckoff Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965