Legal Opinion

Brown v. Olmsted

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1956No. 33617PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants and interveners from trespassing on their property, and seek damages from defendants Eldon F. Olmsted and his wife for prior trespasses. From a decree enjoining any further trespasses and awarding three hundred fifty dollars in damages for prior trespasses, defendants Olmsted and the inter-veners appeal. (Hereinafter, “defendants” refers only to Eldon F. Olmsted and his wife.)

We are here concerned with whether the defendants and interveners have private easements over two thirty-foot strips of land in Kitsap county, which strips were at one time…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gillis v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Murphy v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Van Buren v. TrumbullWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hanson v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. City of Olympia v. PalzerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Miller v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Clippinger v. BirgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Humphrey v. JenksWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API