Legal Opinion

DeWeese v. City of Port Townsend

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 27, 1984No. 6705-6-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Worswick, A.C.J.

— We are asked to decide whether traditional rules for determining standing to challenge a street vacation apply where the street in question abuts a body of water. We hold that broader principles apply, and reverse a trial court ruling to the contrary.

Lawrence Street runs in a northeast-southwest direction within Port Townsend. It is developed and open for traffic northeast of Kearney Street. Kearney, developed and open for traffic, crosses Lawrence at a right angle. Lawrence, although platted southwest of Kearney, is undeveloped between Kearney and the point where it abuts…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kucera v. State, Dept. of Transp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City of Federal Way v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Herzog v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Snohomish County Property Rights Alliance v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Kucera v. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API