Murphy v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Yakey, J., entered May 8, 1906, denying plaintiff’s application for an injunction to prevent the opening of streets to public use.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
On the 24th day of September, 1891, Charles Waters, being the owner of a certain tract of land in King county, platted the same into lots and blocks and filed a plat thereof in the office of the county auditor as prescribed by law. The plaintiff in this action has succeeded by mesne conveynnc.es to all the right, title and interest of Waters in certain blocks and parts of blocks designated on this plat, and also in certain streets abutting on the property so acquired. At the time of filing the plat the lands embraced therein were situated within the body of King county, and without the limits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Town of West Seattle v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Horey v. . Village of HaverstrawNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Paine Lumber Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Buffalo v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Mangam v. President & TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Gillis v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Sowadzki v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Van Buren v. TrumbullWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Howell v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.