Baxter-Wyckoff Co. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
— This is a consolidated action in which the plaintiffs (respondents), Baxter-Wyckoff Company and the Nettleton Lumber Company, seek to enjoin the defendant (appellant), City of Seattle, from collecting certain fees charged in connection with street use permits issued to the plaintiffs and covering their private use of Southwest Florida Street.
Plaintiff Baxter-Wyckoff Company is a lessee of the property abutting on both sides of Southwest Florida Street. Plaintiff Nettleton Lumber Company is an abutting owner of the property adjoining the Baxter-Wyckoff property on the east. Southwest Florida…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hadfield v. LundinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Adams v. Commissioners of TrappeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Town of West Seattle v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Schafer v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Mall, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 v. Broadview Television Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Kiely v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Issaquah v. Teleprompter Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.