Legal Opinion
Cardenas v. United Nuclear Homestake Partners
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 1981No. 4983PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court finding claimant not to be disabled and denying, with the exception of two medical bills, the allowance of workmen’s compensation or related benefits.
Plaintiff sustained an injury while working as an underground miner in defendant’s uranium mine near Grants, New Mexico on December 3, 1979. The accident that precipitated plaintiff’s claim was occasioned by a bank cave-in which struck him on the back and head and pushed him about eight or nine feet along the tunnel.
Plaintiff was treated or examined by five…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anaya v. New Mexico Steel Erectors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Greenfield v. BruskasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Trujillo v. TanuzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Moorhead v. Gray Ranch Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Williams v. City of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sanchez v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Albuquerque National Bank v. Albuquerque Ranch Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Sanchez v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Roybal v. MorrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.