Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
The litigants here are at odds over whether three financial transactions in which plaintiffs purportedly-leased personal property from defendant were in fact loans at a usurious rate of interest. The trial court concluded that the first two transactions were bona fide leases of personal prop erty but that the third was a loan of money and that the rate of interest was usurious. 1 It granted judgment for the total amount of interest plaintiffs had paid on account of the third transaction.
Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of leasing personal property, which it purchases for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- United Airlines, Inc. v. Hsbc Bank Usa, N.A., as Trustee, and California Statewide Communities Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rosen v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.