Legal Opinion

Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1969No. L. A. 29496PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

The litigants here are at odds over whether three financial transactions in which plaintiffs purportedly-leased personal property from defendant were in fact loans at a usurious rate of interest. The trial court concluded that the first two transactions were bona fide leases of personal prop erty but that the third was a loan of money and that the rate of interest was usurious. 1 It granted judgment for the total amount of interest plaintiffs had paid on account of the third transaction.

Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of leasing personal property, which it purchases for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. United Airlines, Inc. v. Hsbc Bank Usa, N.A., as Trustee, and California Statewide Communities Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Rosen v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API