Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Axsom

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1911No. 550Published

The opinion states the case.

1DissentDavidson, Presiding Judge

(dissenting).—I feel constrained to dissent' in this case from the conclusion reached by my brethren that the opening of a pool room or the operation of a pool room or billiard hall on Sunday is a violation of the Sunday law. Especially do I disagree with this on the ground upon which they place it, that is, that the man who opens his pool room or operates it on Sunday is a laborer within the terms of our statute.

Article 196 of the Penal Code, which relator was charged with violating, reads as follows: "Any person who shall hereafter labor or compel, force or oblige his employes, workmen or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. McPherson v. StroupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Wildner v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. In re Ho KingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1883
  5. Stuart v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API