Legal Opinion
In re Ho King
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
Deady, D. J.
This is a proceeding by habeas corpus to procure the deliverance of one Ho King for an alleged unlawful restraint upon his liberty. The writ issued upon the petition of Lo Wy, a subject of the Chinese empire, residing in Portland, and upon the allegation therein that King was mot permitted to bring it himself, and was directed to W. Jarvis, the master of the steam-ship T. C. Hook, under whose restraint King was alleged to be. The respondent brings the body into court, and for return to the writ says that on November 25, 1882, at the port of Hong Kong, Ho King took passage on the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Paddock v. BalgordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Universal Pictures Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lew Quen Wo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- Ex Parte AxsomCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- In re Kumekichi TsugawaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1914