Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Poole

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■ Certiorari. Before Judge Brinson. Eickmond superior court. January 20, 1900. -#

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

Tke only question presented by tke bill of exceptions in tke present case is whether or not tke wages of tke plaintiff in error were exempt from tke process of garnishment, on tke ground that he was a “laborer” within tke meaning of section 4732 of tke Civil Code. Tke case was tried in a justice’s court upon an agreed statement of facts, and a judgment was therein rendered subjecting Stuart’s wages to tke garnishment. He sued out a certiorari, to tke overruling of which he excepted. From tke agreed statement of facts it appeared that he was a “street-railway conductor,” and that kis duties as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Kline v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Pike v. SuttonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Ex Parte AxsomCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API