McPherson v. Stroup
Supreme Court of Georgia
Garnishment — certiorari. Before Judge Lumpkin. Bullion superior court. March term, 1896.
1Opinion of the Court
Fish, Justice.
Stroup sued McPherson in justice’s court, for $67.80 on account, and garnished the Chattahoochee Brick Go., which .answered that it was indebted to McPherson a certain .amount. McPherson filed a claim to the fund, alleging that it was due him as a day-laborer and was his daily wages, and -therefore was exempt from garnishment. TJpon the trial of this issue in the claim case, the magistrate, after hearing the - evidence, decided that the fund was not due McPherson for -daily wages, that he was not a laborer, and that the fund was ■subject to garnishment. McPherson took the matter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
3Cited by14 opinions
- Howell v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Lindale Brick Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Thompson v. PassmoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Walsh v. International Fidelity InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
- Hunter v. Morgan & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.