Legal Opinion

Hill v. Davis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 2005No. 32A05-0412-CV-694PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

Jonathan Hill ("Jonathan") and Kelly Hill ("Kelly") (collectively referred to as Tenants") appeal the small claims court's judgment in favor of Lanie Davis ("Landlord") on Landlord's notice of claim and against Tenants on Tenants' counterclaim. Tenants raise one issue, which we restate as whether the small claims court's judgment that Landlord was entitled to damages and that Tenants were not entitled to the return of their security deposit was clearly erroneous. We reverse and remand.

The relevant facts follow. On August 21, 2008, Tenants entered into a lease agreement…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Dunkirk Water & Sewage Dept. v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Logal v. CruseIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Brubaker v. PRITCHARD, JUDGE, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lae v. HouseholderIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Robinson v. GazvodaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Klotz v. HoytIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. WinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Hill v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Cash in a Flash, Inc. v. McCulloughIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Klotz v. HoytIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API