Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Gazvoda
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 4, 2003No. 55A01-0204-CV-128PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Jim Robinson, the tenant, argues that the trial court erred in finding that Bruce Gazvoda, the landlord, complied with the Indiana security deposit statute. In particular, the tenant argues that there is no evidence in the record to support the trial court's finding that the landlord mailed to him an itemized list of repair costs as required under Indiana Code §§ 32-7-5-12(a) and 82-7-5-14. Because we find that the landlord failed to provide the tenant with a list of repair costs within forty-five days after receiving the tenant's new address, we reverse and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Clifft v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Park 100 Development Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- State, Indiana Civil Rights Com'n v. INIIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Turner v. Board of Aviation CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Shaffer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lae v. HouseholderIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Paternity of E.M.L.G.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hill v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.