Legal Opinion

Klotz v. Hoyt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2008No. 18A02-0707-CV-556PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

Tenant-landlord disputes are all too common. Here, two tenants undisputedly stopped paying rent after the first one and one-half months of their lease, did a substantial amount of damage to the inside of the residence, and abandoned the residence without informing the landlord or leaving their respective forwarding addresses. The tenants are contractually obligated, by virtue of their valid and binding lease, to repay the back due rent and late fees notwithstanding the landlord’s compli-*1235anee with statutory requirements governing the handling of security deposits.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lae v. HouseholderIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Blasko v. Menard, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Hill v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Durf v. MolterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klotz v. HoytIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Klotz v. HoytIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Klotz v. HoytIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Klotz v. HoytIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API