Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Winkle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2007No. 49A05-0511-CV-653PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

Due to malpractice committed by doctors during her pregnancy, Lori Winkle suffered from malnutrition resulting in a neurological injury. She also lost the child she and her husband, Darrin Winkle, were expecting. Lori and Darrin initiated malpractice proceedings and ultimately settled with certain health care providers for the then-statutory limitation of $100,000. Lori and Darrin subsequently filed an action against the Indiana Patient’s Compensation Fund (the “Fund”) seeking payment of excess damages. The trial court determined that Lori and Darrin…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bolin v. WingertIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Groves v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Mayhue v. SparkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Spangler v. BechtelIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sterenbuch v. GossColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Seiwert v. Spencer-Owen Community School Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
  4. Popovich v. DanielsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Draper v. DeFrenchi-GordineerColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API