Legal Opinion
Cash in a Flash, Inc. v. McCullough
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 2006No. 71A03-0510-CV-482PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Cash in a Flash, Inc. (CIF), appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying CIF statutory attorney fees and treble damages following appellant-defendant Henry McCullough’s failure to repay a small, or “payday,” loan in a timely fashion. 1 Finding that CIF failed to prove that McCullough acted fraudulently, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
FACTS
On January 16, 2004, McCullough executed a contract with CIF, located in Mish-awaka, to obtain a short-term small loan. Specifically, McCullough obtained a $200 loan for a two-week period. CIF imposed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sees v. Bank One, Indiana, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Huntington Mortgage Co. v. DeBrotaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Livingston v. Fast Cash USA, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Bender v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hill v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Klinker v. First Merchants Bank, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
- APEX 1 PROCESSING, INC. v. EdwardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re RUETH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, an Indiana Limited PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- PAYDAY TODAY, INC. v. DeFREEUWIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. v. Conseco Medical InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.