Legal Opinion
David v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1989No. Civ. 880234PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Loren G. David appealed from a summary judgment granted in favor of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc., Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. [hereinafter collectively referred to as Merrill Lynch], and Edward Williams. The district court determined that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to David’s claim that he was fraudulently induced to enter into an arbitration agreement, concluded that the arbitration agreement" complied with applicable statutes and regulations, and ordered that all other claims be compelled to arbitration. We affirm.
In May 1981…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coplon v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Jack B. Cohen, Betty L. Cohen v. Wedbush, Noble, Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Kramer v. KramerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Burk v. Nance Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Schmidt v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Schwarz v. GierkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.