Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Kramer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2006No. 20050222PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kenneth Kramer appeals from a divorce judgment that incorporated a property settlement agreement between Cheryl Kramer and him. He argues the district court erred in failing to review the settlement agreement for unconscionability, erred in enforcing the agreement, and erred in issuing a protective order. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In May 2002, Cheryl Kramer and Kenneth Kramer signed a “legal separation agreement/property settlement agreement” that provided:

9. SUBSEQUENT DIVORCE. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to prevent either of the parties from maintaining a suit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Schmidkunz v. SchmidkunzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Crawford v. CrawfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Weber v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hagel v. HagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Christian v. ChristianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Vann v. VannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API