Eberle v. Eberle
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Heidi Eberle appealed from an order denying her request for attorney’s fees, an order denying her motion to compel compliance with N.D.R.Ct. 8.3(a), and an order denying relief from a divorce judgment. We conclude her settlement agreement with John Eberle is unconscionable, and we reverse the district court’s order denying relief from the judgment and remand for an equitable division of the marital estate. We affirm the district court’s orders denying Heidi Eberle’s request for attorney’s fees and her motion to compel.
I
[¶ 2] John and Heidi Eberle were married…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Radigan v. RadiganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Sommers v. SommersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Strand v. US NATL. BANK NATL. ASS'N NDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Weber v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Martinson v. MartinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Vann v. VannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Willprecht v. WillprechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Bluegrass PowerboatsKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.