Legal Opinion
Quintana v. First Interstate Bank
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 23, 1987No. 8405PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
In this lawsuit, plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages against defendant (the Bank) for alleged tortious interference with plaintiffs’ contractual or prospective contractual relations. Plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm.
Where the trial court grants a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the allegations of the complaint must be taken as true for the purposes of appeal. Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co., 96 N.M. 789, 635 P.2d 992 (Ct.App.1981). The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- M & M Rental Tools, Inc. v. Milchem, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Williams v. AshcraftNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Knight v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Fabricor, Inc. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bill Call Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
- Central Bank of Lake of the Ozarks v. ShacklefordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- New Mexico Oncology & Hematology Consultants, Ltd. v. Presbyterian Healthcare ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.