M & M Rental Tools, Inc. v. Milchem, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This appeal involves interference with prospective contractual relations. Plaintiff contended it was about to rent a centrifugal pump to a customer and defendants wrongfully interfered with this prospect. Defendants rented the pump to the customer, but had plaintiff install the pump. Plaintiff complains that the trial court improperly permitted defendants to cross-examine concerning plaintiff’s charge for the installation. We disagree. The cross-examination tended to show that plaintiff overcharged for installing the pump. This was relevant to the reasonableness of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Owen v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Proctor v. WaxlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Acme Cigarette Services, Inc. v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Feldman v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.