Legal Opinion

Williams v. Ashcraft

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1963No. 7195PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This is a tort action for wrongfully inducing breach of contract. There is no dispute as to the facts. The appellees, real estate brokers, on February 24, 1961, consummated a binding contract by the terms of which W. T. Pitts and wife were to convey to one Sanchez, the purchaser, certain real estate for a consideration of $20,000.00, and to pay the appellees for their services a commission of $1200.00, plus sales tax of $36.00. Under date of March 22, 1961, the appellant, K. E. Ashcraft, with full knowledge of the existing agreement between Pitts and Sanchez induced…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bliss v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Tipton v. BursonArizona Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lovelace Medical Center v. Mendez Ex Rel. MendezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. M & M Rental Tools, Inc. v. Milchem, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Ettenson v. BurkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API