Knight v. Snap-On Tools Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Earl R.H. Knight was a tool dealer for Snap-On Tools Corporation (“Snap-On”). After their business relationship soured, Knight sued Snap-On for, among other things, tortious interference with prospective contractual relations and violation of the New Mexico Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”). The district court directed a verdict for Snap-On on the tortious interference claim; Knight received a jury verdict and a $23,116 award on the UTPA claim. The district court denied both parties’ claims for attorneys’ fees and costs. Knight appeals the directed verdict on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- James Richard Erdman v. Cochise County, Arizona and City of Douglas, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ernest E. Riggs v. Scrivner, Inc., an Oklahoma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Patrick Vasey v. Martin Marietta Corporation, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- E.G. Thompson and Betty Thompson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Oja v. Howmedica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Tunison v. Continental Airlines Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.