Legal Opinion

Knight v. Snap-On Tools Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1993No. Nos. 91-2120, 91-2122, 92-2020 and 92-2031PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Earl R.H. Knight was a tool dealer for Snap-On Tools Corporation (“Snap-On”). After their business relationship soured, Knight sued Snap-On for, among other things, tortious interference with prospective contractual relations and violation of the New Mexico Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”). The district court directed a verdict for Snap-On on the tortious interference claim; Knight received a jury verdict and a $23,116 award on the UTPA claim. The district court denied both parties’ claims for attorneys’ fees and costs. Knight appeals the directed verdict on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. James Richard Erdman v. Cochise County, Arizona and City of Douglas, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Ernest E. Riggs v. Scrivner, Inc., an Oklahoma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Patrick Vasey v. Martin Marietta Corporation, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. E.G. Thompson and Betty Thompson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Oja v. Howmedica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Tunison v. Continental Airlines Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API