Legal Opinion
Charles S. Sorrell, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Rinker Materials Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2005No. 03-4359, 03-4443PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
In this case brought pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq., plaintiff Charles S. Sorrell appeals, and defendant Rinker Materials Corporation cross-appeals, the district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of Rinker. For the reasons that follow, we VACATE the district court’s judgment and REMAND for further proceedings.
I
Charles Sorrell began working for a predecessor of Rinker Materials Corporation in 1977 and, for the last thirteen years or so, held an outside sales position in the company. This position required Sorrell to sell…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daniel R. Arban, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. West Publishing Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Strickland v. Water Works & Sewer Board of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Nancy Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Samuel J. Cavin v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Heidi Hostettler v. College of WoosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Twigg v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Wysong v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Peter J. Kauffman v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Novak v. MetroHealth Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.