Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Charlotte Bagging Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The plaintiff contends: “That the judgment of the Superior Court should be reversed because the only evidence upon which the Industrial Commission issued an award ivas upon the incompetent testimony of Dr. Kipp, no one else, as the record will show, testified that the deceased received any other injury except the one caused by the falling brick.” ¥e think the record discloses evidence that Pink Johnson deceased, died as a result of pneumothorax following bronchitis and not of any injury.

In Brown v. Ice Co., ante, at p. 100, we find; Brogden, J.: “Obviously, if all the testimony offered by a…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wray v. . Woolen MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Ridout v. Rose's 5-10-25c StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Massey v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Maley v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Maley v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API