Lovitch v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner Susan Lovitch requests this court to set aside an Industrial Commission award dismissing her January 12, 2000, Petition to Reopen her 1993 claim after it found that the issues raised were previously litigated, final, and res judicata. The sole issue raised is whether the evidence supports Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Overholt’s conclusion that Lovitch’s Petition to Reopen was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. *104We agree with Judge Overholt’s decision and therefore affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Initial Injury
¶2 Lovitch sustained an industrial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Circle K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Pascucci v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Landon v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Gutierrez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Aguayo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Pf Chang's v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.