City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management v. Scott Woodworth
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this statutory petition for special action, petitioners City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management (collectively “Pinnacle”) challenge the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) findings and decision upon review affirming his award for a compensable hernia claim. Pinnacle contends there was no evidence Woodworth was incapable of feeling pain in the hernia region and that he failed to meet all the statutory requirements for a compensable hernia injury claim. Because the ALJ did not err, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We view the evidence in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Sandoval v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diaz v. Sun ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Emilio v. vip/auto-ownersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Martinez v. ShcCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Martis v. cienega/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Sherring v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018