Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard M. Frisk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1982No. 80-4583PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
Richard M. Frisk, the co-obligor on his son’s federally insured student loan, defaulted along with his son on the note. Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Insured Student Loan Program, the lending institution assigned the note to the United States and the Government discharged Frisk’s obligation. The Government brought suit on the note and Frisk defended by alleging that the suit was barred by the applicable six-year statute of limitations. The district court, 530 F.Supp. 238, concluded that the action was not time-barred and granted the Government’s motion for summary judgment. We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- First National Park Bank v. Snellen M. Johnson and Ven SavageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark v. Pacific-Peru Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hercules, Inc. v. Stevens Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. OlavarrietaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Henry L. Milam, W. Larue Boyce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Elizabeth A. TilleraasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gary L. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.