Legal Opinion

Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark v. Pacific-Peru Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1977No. 75-1790PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, N. J. (“CIC”), a New Jersey corporation, obtained a summary judgment in its favor requiring Pacific-Peru Construction Corp. (“Pacific-Peru”), a Nevada corporation, and The Hawaii Corporation (“HC”),1 a Hawaii corporation, to indemnify CIC pursuant to bonding, indemnity, and reinsurance contracts executed in connection with construction work performed in Peru. Federal jurisdiction was grounded on diversity. The district court granted summary judgment on two grounds: (1) CIC was entitled to indemnification because its right…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Irene Bartsch v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Markley v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Willie H. Harris, Ernestine Harris v. Polskie Linie Lotnicze, AKA Lot Polish Airlines, a Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
  5. In re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Illinois on May 25, 1979Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API