Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wooldridge

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 11, 1925No. 352PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

The National Bank of Cleburne, Texas, became insolvent through the frauds of its president and closed its doors on October 17, 1921. On November 1 following the defendant in error was appointed receiver, and on April 14, 1922, began this suit upon a bond executed by the plaintiff in error on August 28, 1921, binding it to' indemnify the Bank for losses of this character to the extent of $25,000. The Guaranty Company pleaded in set-off that on August 24, 1921, it became surety for the Bank upon another bond to the Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway Company, conditioned upon payment by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Johnston v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Yardley v. PhillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WooldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Washington Mechanics' Sav. Bank v. District Title Ins.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  2. California Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  3. New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. In re the Estate of BairdWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. United States v. Richard M. FriskCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API