Marshville Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Maslin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The first exception imputes error to the trial court in ordering a reference in this case. The exception is without merit. C. S., 573, provides for a compulsory reference, “2. Where the taking of an account is necessary for the information of the court, before judgment, or for carrying a judgment or order into effect.” Chalk v. Bank, 87 N. C., 200.
“Our statutes relating to trials by referees serve a useful purpose and must be liberally construed. They aid and simplify the work which would otherwise fall upon the court and jury, and often expedite the litigation and save the parties from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Booker v. Town of HighlandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Yelverton v. . ColeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Alley v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Gurganus v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Better Home Furniture Co. of Winston-Salem v. BaronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Gurganus v. . McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.