Legal Opinion

Colman v. Schwendiman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1984No. 18652PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

The Utah Department of Public Safety revoked plaintiff William Colman’s driver’s license because of his failure to submit to a breathalyzer test pursuant to Utah’s implied consent statute, U.C.A., 1953, § 41-6-44.10. The district court upheld that decision; plaintiff appeals. We reverse.

Near midnight on May 29, 1981, plaintiff was stopped by the Highway Patrol because of his erratic driving behavior, including allowing his vehicle to drift over the center line several times. When plaintiff rolled down his window to speak to the officer, the officer detected an odor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. BillingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. McKnight v. State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Blackburn v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, DEPT.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Spangler v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Dawson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burkett v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Mickelsen v. Craigco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. RamosMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Baker v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Moore v. SchwendimanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API