Legal Opinion

Baker v. Schwendiman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1986No. 20181PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The Department of Public Safety revoked plaintiff’s driver’s license pursuant to Utah’s implied consent statute, U.C.A., 1953, § 41-6-44.10. That decision was upheld by the district court after a trial de novo. Plaintiff appeals the judgment of the district court.

At approximately 2:45 a.m. on January 1, 1984, plaintiff was arrested for driving under the influence. It was stipulated at trial that the arresting officer, Jim Smith of the Utah Highway Patrol, had probable cause to make the arrest. Plaintiff was taken to the Millard County Public Safety Building, where the officer explained the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beck v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Conrad v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Helsten v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Colman v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BonvieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. Mickelsen v. Craigco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BonvieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. State v. BonvieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Whitehouse v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API