Legal Opinion
Moore v. Schwendiman
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided February 17, 1988No. 870248-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
This is an appeal from a district court judgment affirming an order of the Department of Public Safety (the Department) revoking appellant’s driver’s license for his refusal to take an intoxilyzer test in violation of Utah’s implied consent statute. Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-44.10 (1984). We reverse.
On August 5, 1984, appellant was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-44 (1984). At the scene of the arrest, Officer Sullivan, after giving appellant the requisite admonitions, requested appellant to take an intoxilyzer test.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilcox v. BillingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Board of Education of the Granite School District v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Grant v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Blackburn v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, DEPT.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Dawson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ferro v. Utah Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Salt Lake City v. KunzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Mabus v. BlackstockCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- ICS Corrections v. Procurement Policy BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Mabus v. BlackstockCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.