Legal Opinion
Burkett v. Schwendiman
Utah Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1989No. 19965PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Plaintiff William M. Burkett appeals from a trial court decision revoking his driver’s license pursuant to Utah’s implied consent statute. Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-44.10 (Supp.1983) (amended 1987 & 1988). Burkett claims that the trial court erred in finding that the Utah Department of Public Safety complied with the requirements of the Code in initiating the driver’s license revocation proceedings. We dismiss the appeal.
We need only summarize the facts. On November 25, 1983, Uintah County Deputy Sheriff Ted Freestone and three back-up officers arrested…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wickham v. FisherUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Kehl v. SchwendimanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Black v. Alpha Financial Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Colman v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Utah Transit Authority v. Local 382 of the Amalgamated Transit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Ellis v. SwensenUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SimsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- 49th Street Galleria v. Tax Commission, Auditing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.