Legal Opinion

Mickelsen v. Craigco, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1989No. 19945PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Garry W. Mickelsen brought this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien which he had recorded against the River Oaks subdivision owned by defendant Cra-igco, Inc. Defendant Sherwood & Roberts, Inc., which was the beneficiary of a trust deed on the subdivision, moved for summary judgment on three grounds: (1) that plaintiffs foreclosure action had not been timely commenced; (2) that plaintiffs recorded notice of lien was invalid because it had not been properly verified; and (3) that no work had been done in the subdivision and no materials had been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McKnight v. State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Blackburn v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, DEPT.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Spangler v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. First Security Mortgage Co. v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Totorica v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. P.H. Investment v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. State v. Gutierrez-PerezUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Worthington & Kimball Construction Co. v. C & A Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API