Farrakhan v. Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their claim that Washington state’s felon disenfranchisement scheme constitutes improper race-based vote denial in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (“Section 2”), 42 U.S.C. § 1973. Upon conviction of an infamous crime in the state of Washington, each plaintiff was disenfranchised, and none has had his voting rights restored.
The district court determined that although Washington’s felon disenfranchisement scheme disenfranchises a disproportionate number of African-American,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Simmons v. GalvinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Frank v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Jalil Abdul Muntaqim, Also Known as Anthony Bottom v. Phillip Coombe, Anthony Annucci, and Louis F. MannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Farrakhan v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.